Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official
by Crawlora-org
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

tiktok_creative_center_videos

Retrieve TikTok Creative Center trending videos by country, period, and sort order with organic-only and content label filters for creative research.

Instructions

Retrieve TikTok Creative Center trending videos. Returns TikTok Creative Center's ranked trending videos for a country, period, and sort order. TikTok reports the true result-set size (see total_count/page_count in the response) but gates access to it behind a logged-in TikTok One account: an anonymous request always receives page 1 (4 videos) regardless of sort order or period. Country coverage is uneven: US, JP, ID, VN, and TH reliably return populated results; other countries have been observed to return an empty videos array (a genuine no-data response, not an error).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
periodNoLookback window in days
sort_byNoSort order
country_codeYesISO-2 country code
organic_onlyNoRestrict to organic (non-paid) videos only
content_label_idNoContent tag id to filter by

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.17.5
    • addedInput schema / properties / period / enum
      Added value: +[
+  7,
+  30
+]
    • addedInput schema / properties / sort_by / enum
      Added value: +[
+  "views",
+  "engagement",
+  "six_second_views"
+]
  2. Added

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It clearly discloses that anonymous requests always return page 1 (4 videos) regardless of sort/period, that the true result-set size is reported via total_count/page_count but gated behind a logged-in TikTok One account, and that some countries return empty arrays (genuine no-data, not errors). This is exemplary transparency about edge cases and limitations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, and every sentence adds necessary operational detail. It avoids fluff but is not as tight as the calibration example; still, it is efficient and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description must explain response characteristics. It mentions total_count/page_count and the page-1 behavior, which is essential. With 5 parameters and no output schema, the description covers the key caveats but does not detail the video object fields or pagination mechanics beyond that. Slightly more detail could be added, but it is largely complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds contextual meaning for country_code by noting uneven coverage and that period/sort_by do not affect the page-size limitation for anonymous requests. This goes beyond the schema descriptions and helps an agent infer parameter implications.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the verb 'Retrieve' and the resource 'TikTok Creative Center trending videos' clearly. It specifies that it returns ranked trending videos by country, period, and sort order. However, it does not explicitly distinguish itself from sibling tools like tiktok_trending or tiktok_creative_center_hashtags, so a 4 is appropriate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides meaningful usage guidance about authentication (anonymous requests get page 1 only) and country coverage (which countries reliably return data). However, it does not mention when to choose this tool over alternatives, nor does it state exclusions. These usage hints are valuable but incomplete for selection guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools