Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

everlane_sitemap_urls

Retrieve Everlane sitemap URLs by type, including products, collections, pages, blogs, or all, with an optional result limit. Get capped URL entries in JSON for crawling or SEO analysis.

Instructions

List Everlane sitemap URLs. Returns capped URL entries from Everlane's (https://www.everlane.com) child sitemaps matching the requested type. The storefront URL is fixed server-side.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
typeNoSitemap type. Allowed values: all, products, collections, pages, blogs, agentic_discovery, other
limitNoMaximum URL entries, defaults to 50 and supports up to 250

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.17.5
    • addedInput schema / properties / type / enum
      Added value: +[
      +  "all",
      +  "products",
      +  "collections",
      +  "pages",
      +  "blogs",
      +  "agentic_discovery",
      +  "other"
      +]
  2. Addedv1.16.0

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of behavioral context. It discloses that results are capped, filtered by type, and the base URL is fixed. It does not mention pagination, response format, or any other side effects, but for a simple read-only sitemap fetch, this is adequate though not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no filler. The purpose is front-loaded, the key constraint (capped, matching type) is included, and the fixed storefront note is useful without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter tool with no output schema, the description covers the main behaviors: listing URLs, filtering by type, and the fixed domain. It doesn't mention default/max limit (though that is in the schema) or return format, but those are minor given the tool's simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for both parameters, so the schema already documents 'type' and 'limit'. The description adds the context of 'capped' and 'matching the requested type', but this is mostly a restatement of the schema rather than new semantic meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('List'), a specific resource ('Everlane sitemap URLs'), and clarifies that it returns entries from child sitemaps matching the requested type. This clearly distinguishes it from other sitemap tools such as allbirds_sitemap_urls or gymshark_sitemap_urls by naming Everlane explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use this tool: when you need Everlane sitemap URLs of a certain type. It also notes that the storefront URL is fixed server-side, indicating no need to provide a base URL. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use it, leaving a minor gap.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools