tmdb_tv_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description correctly states 'Credential-free public TMDB data' implying no authentication needed. However, it does not disclose rate limits, pagination, or behavior when no results are found. The description is adequate but lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with no waste. It front-loads the purpose, then adds options and a note about credentials. Every sentence is informative and concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description only says 'Returns a TMDB TV chart' without specifying the structure of the response (e.g., list of shows, data fields). This is insufficient for an agent to understand what data will be returned.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%. The description adds value by listing the possible category values (popular, top rated, airing today, on the air) beyond the schema's vague 'TV chart' description. The limit parameter is not elaborated, but the default and max are in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves a TMDB TV chart and lists specific categories (popular, top rated, airing today, on the air). The name 'tmdb_tv_list' and context of sibling tools like tmdb_movie_list and tmdb_search help differentiate its focus on TV charts, but the description itself does not explicitly distinguish from siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like tmdb_movie_list or tmdb_search. It mentions 'Credential-free' which is useful but does not help the agent choose between similar tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.