Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to Crawlora MCP

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Use 3,000+ pre-built cloud tools from Apify, known as Actors, to extract data from websites, e-commerce, social media, search engines, maps, and more
    10
    25,052 npm
    7,312
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A context-optimized web scraping server that converts HTML to markdown/text and applies CSS selectors server-side, reducing token usage by 70-90% while providing AI tools with clean, filtered web content.
    7
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to interact with the Apify platform to manage actors, monitor runs, and retrieve scraped data from datasets. It supports natural language commands for executing web scrapers, managing tasks, and accessing key-value stores.
    28
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An MCP server that provides structured Google Search capabilities including web, images, news, videos, maps, and local places via the AceDataCloud SERP API. It enables AI clients to perform localized searches and retrieve detailed information from the Google Knowledge Graph.
    11
    100 PyPI
    1
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server exposing 35 web scraping and SERP tools for general scraping, Google services, e-commerce sites, social media, and search engines. Enables MCP clients like Claude to scrape web pages and search results via natural language.
    35
    28 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Remote MCP server with 19 e-commerce and IP-compliance data tools — Amazon product/review/search/niche/bestseller data, AI SERP & keyword trends, local Maps POI, WIPO trademark search, and PACER patent litigation. No scraping code or proxies needed; one API key unlocks all tools.
    21
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A general-purpose MCP server for crawling and extracting structured data from any website. Supports tools for crawling, single-page extraction, search-and-crawl, and schema extraction.
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Web scraping MCP server for Al agents. 6 tools: extract clean text/markdown from any URL, structured scraping with CSS selectors, full-page screenshots via Playwright, link extraction with regex filtering, metadata extraction (OG tags, Twitter cards), and Google search. Free tier: 50 requests/IP/day.
    8
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server for web scraping with natural language, enabling site crawling, page fetching, and extraction of emails, phones, links, and social profiles. Returns clean markdown, handles JavaScript rendering, and respects rate limits.
    24
    1
    MIT

TDQS

C2.6/5.0

Scored across 1873 tools

Disambiguation2/5

The tool set is dominated by dozens of near-identical brand-prefixed families (shopify_product, allbirds_product, rothys_product, etc.) that differ only by the pinned domain, plus overlapping generic search engines (google_search, bing_search, brave_search, duckduckgo_search, yahoo_search). An agent cannot easily distinguish which of the many repetitive tools to call without reading long descriptions.

Naming Consistency4/5

Naming is largely consistent as {domain}_{resource} in snake_case (adidas_product, capterra_search, kalshi_market). Minor deviations exist such as singular/plural inconsistency (apple_maps_guide vs apple_maps_guides, opensea_collection vs opensea_collections) and a few standalone verbs (extract, web_scrape), but the overall pattern is predictable.

Tool Count1/5

1873 tools is an extreme count that no agent can reasonably navigate or evaluate. The server is an unbounded scrape-everything aggregator rather than a scoped tool surface, and the sheer volume makes tool selection a serious cognitive burden.

Completeness3/5

Individual domain families often have deep coverage (search, product detail, reviews, stores, sitemaps), but coverage is uneven across brands—some families are missing companion tools (e.g., recommendations, sitemap URLs) that others have. The sprawling scope makes it impossible for an agent to know whether any given domain's surface is complete, so it will frequently discover gaps only after failed calls.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues