Crawlora MCP
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Crawlora MCP
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceUse 3,000+ pre-built cloud tools from Apify, known as Actors, to extract data from websites, e-commerce, social media, search engines, maps, and more1011,443 npm13,174MIT- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceInteract with WebScraping.AI API for web data extraction and scraping1029 npm45MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA context-optimized web scraping server that converts HTML to markdown/text and applies CSS selectors server-side, reducing token usage by 70-90% while providing AI tools with clean, filtered web content.8MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with the Apify platform to manage actors, monitor runs, and retrieve scraped data from datasets. It supports natural language commands for executing web scrapers, managing tasks, and accessing key-value stores.28MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides structured Google Search capabilities including web, images, news, videos, maps, and local places via the AceDataCloud SERP API. It enables AI clients to perform localized searches and retrieve detailed information from the Google Knowledge Graph.11243 PyPI1MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server exposing 35 web scraping and SERP tools for general scraping, Google services, e-commerce sites, social media, and search engines. Enables MCP clients like Claude to scrape web pages and search results via natural language.3524 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to scrape web pages, extract structured data, search, crawl sites, generate schemas, schedule monitors, and inspect credits/history through hosted or local integrations.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA universal data intelligence MCP server that enables AI agents to search, extract, structure, and analyze information from supported web sources. Provides machine-readable results for research, data processing, and automated workflows through a simple, reusable interface.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceRemote MCP server with 19 e-commerce and IP-compliance data tools — Amazon product/review/search/niche/bestseller data, AI SERP & keyword trends, local Maps POI, WIPO trademark search, and PACER patent litigation. No scraping code or proxies needed; one API key unlocks all tools.211MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA general-purpose MCP server for crawling and extracting structured data from any website. Supports tools for crawling, single-page extraction, search-and-crawl, and schema extraction.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceWeb scraping MCP server for Al agents. 6 tools: extract clean text/markdown from any URL, structured scraping with CSS selectors, full-page screenshots via Playwright, link extraction with regex filtering, metadata extraction (OG tags, Twitter cards), and Google search. Free tier: 50 requests/IP/day.8MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3665 tools
With 3,665 tools, hundreds share nearly identical purposes across different sources (dozens of `<outlet>_news`/`_headlines`/`_sections`/`_article`/`_author` families, plus parallel live-vs-`datasets_*` versions of the same data, e.g. bbb-search vs datasets_bbb_businesses_search, google_trends_explore vs its sub-widgets). An agent cannot reliably tell which of the many near-duplicate tools to pick for a given intent.
Names follow a largely predictable snake_case `<source>_<resource>` pattern (e.g. guardian_article, ticketmaster_venue, sevennow_promotion), and the `datasets_` prefix cleanly separates indexed corpora. A few oddballs (extract, brand_retrieve, web_scrape, monitors_create) are minor deviations in an otherwise consistent scheme.
3,665 tools is an extreme mismatch for any coherent server scope; it is roughly two orders of magnitude beyond a well-scoped set. Even if each tool earns its place individually, the aggregate surface is unusable as a single tool set.
Breadth is staggering and many domains have full CRUD-like coverage (search/list/detail/sections/facets), so gaps are not the main problem. But coverage is uneven — some sources expose only headlines or only article bodies, and whole domains rely on the same generic web_scrape fallback — so it is broad rather than demonstrably complete.