Fetch supported enum values for Google Trends explore and trending filters, covering locations, date ranges, search types, categories, statuses, and sort modes.
Google Trends enum metadata. Returns supported Google Trends enum values for explore/trending filters, including locations, date ranges, search types, categories, statuses, and sort modes.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description only states it returns enum values, without mentioning read-only behavior, permissions, rate limits, or data freshness. For a metadata tool, this is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence that is clear and directly states the tool's purpose. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite no output schema or annotations, the description explains the tool's function and return categories. However, it lacks detail on the structure of returned data and how the values are used in sibling tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. Description adds nothing beyond schema, but baseline 4 for zero-param tools is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly identifies the tool as returning enum metadata for Google Trends filters, listing specific categories (locations, date ranges, etc.). It distinguishes from sibling tools like google_trends_explore which actually use these enums.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It implies usage for obtaining filter values before using other Google Trends tools, but does not state this directly or mention alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.