Retrieve the complete public section inventory accepted by the Deadline headlines API, including editorial categories and verticals, to ensure valid request parameters.
Get Deadline sections. Returns the complete public section inventory accepted by /api/v1/deadline/headlines (both Deadline's editorial categories and its verticals).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.17.5Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations, so description carries the burden. It discloses that it returns the complete public inventory and mentions the endpoint it feeds, but doesn't state read-only nature or any side effects. For a simple list retrieval, this is adequate but not rich.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences with zero waste. The core purpose is front-loaded, and the endpoint reference adds precise context without redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a no-parameter, no-output-schema tool, this description is complete. It explains what the tool returns and its relationship to the headlines endpoint. An agent knows exactly what to expect.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has zero parameters, so baseline is 4. The description adds meaning by explaining what the returned inventory contains (editorial categories and verticals), which is helpful beyond the empty schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb (Get) and resource (Deadline sections), and explains what it returns: the complete public section inventory for the headlines endpoint. Clearly distinguishes from siblings like deadline_article and deadline_headlines.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implicitly tells when to use it: when you need valid section values for /api/v1/deadline/headlines. It doesn't explicitly contrast with alternatives, but the context is clear and not misleading.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.