Retrieve all public sections accepted by /dawn/headlines, covering Pakistan provinces, World, Business, Sport, Opinion, Technology, Newspaper, Magazines, and Prism.
Get Dawn sections. Returns the complete public Dawn section inventory (Pakistan provinces, World, Business, Sport, Opinion, Technology, Newspaper, Magazines, and Prism) accepted by /dawn/headlines.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.17.5Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. 'Returns the complete public Dawn section inventory' conveys a read-only catalog operation and the 'public' qualifier implies no special authorization, but it does not explicitly state that there are no side effects, no filtering, or no pagination. For a simple getter this is adequate but not richly transparent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no filler. Every element — the action, the resource, the scope ('complete public'), the enumerated contents, and the downstream consumer (/dawn/headlines) — earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter getter with no output schema, the description provides the essential information: what is returned, the full list of sections, and how the output relates to /dawn/headlines. It could have specified the exact shape of returned section values (e.g., slugs vs. display names), but the listing itself largely compensates for the missing output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters and the schema is empty, so the baseline is 4. The description reinforces that no arguments are needed by framing the result as a complete inventory rather than a filtered or parameterized query, which adds useful semantic context beyond the empty schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb and resource ('Get Dawn sections') and enumerates the exact contents of the inventory, making its scope unmistakable. It also ties the tool to /dawn/headlines, which distinguishes it from sibling Dawn tools like dawn_article, dawn_headlines, and dawn_news.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description states that the returned list is the inventory accepted by /dawn/headlines, which gives clear context for when this tool is needed: before or alongside calls to /dawn/headlines. It does not explicitly state when not to use it or name an alternative, but for a zero-parameter inventory tool the context is largely sufficient.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.