Fetch MakeUseOf's current top stories as structured JSON, including titles, canonical URLs, summaries, publication times, authors, and images for quick news aggregation.
Get MakeUseOf top stories. Returns MakeUseOf's current top stories, with no parameters. Each item has its title, canonical article URL, short summary, publication time, and author and image when available.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.17.9Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the burden. It discloses that the tool takes no parameters and lists the fields returned per item, which helps. However, it does not mention read-only nature, rate limits, pagination, or other operational traits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Three sentences, front-loaded with purpose. The first two sentences are somewhat repetitive ('Get MakeUseOf top stories' and 'Returns MakeUseOf's current top stories'), but overall it is efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple, zero-parameter read tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description provides enough context: it explains the source, that no parameters are required, and enumerates the return fields. Missing details like item count or pagination are minor.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline of 4 applies. The description redundantly states 'with no parameters', but the schema already covers this fully.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clear verb ('Get') and resource ('MakeUseOf top stories'), and it specifies the return fields. It does not distinguish itself from sibling tools like makeuseof_headlines or makeuseof_sections, which could also return story lists.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as makeuseof_headlines or makeuseof_article. It only states what it does, leaving the agent to infer usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.