Fetch current Bleacher Report headlines for a chosen league or sub-hub section, returning structured sports news data for monitoring and analysis.
Get Bleacher Report section headlines. Returns current Bleacher Report headlines from one public league or league sub-hub page.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| section | Yes | Bleacher Report section slug |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.17.5Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It transparently indicates the tool returns current headlines and is scoped to public league/sub-hub pages, but it does not mention pagination, rate limits, or the exact shape of returned headline data. This is acceptable for a simple read tool but leaves room for more disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two short sentences with no filler. The primary action and resource are front-loaded, and the scoping detail effectively completes the definition without redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description covers what the tool does and the input scope. It could be more explicit about the return format (e.g., whether headlines include URLs or timestamps), but given the tool's simplicity, it is reasonably complete for an agent to call it correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema already describes the only parameter as a 'Bleacher Report section slug' with a full enum, so the baseline is 3. The description adds meaning by characterizing a section as a 'public league or league sub-hub page,' which helps an agent interpret the enum values and the tool's scope beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('Bleacher Report section headlines'), and adds that it returns current headlines from 'one public league or league sub-hub page.' This makes the tool's function clear, though it does not explicitly differentiate from nearby siblings like bleacherreport_news or bleacherreport_sections.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The context for use is implied: call this tool to retrieve current headlines for a given Bleacher Report section. However, there is no explicit guidance on when to prefer this over sibling tools such as bleacherreport_news or bleacherreport_sections, and no exclusion criteria are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.