Get Bleacher Report league and sub-hub sections accepted by the headlines endpoint, returning clean JSON for valid section names.
Get Bleacher Report sections. Returns the public Bleacher Report league and league sub-hub sections accepted by the headlines endpoint.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.17.5Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavior. It reveals that sections are public and specifically those accepted by the headlines endpoint, which is useful. But it does not mention read-only status, authentication, or error handling, leaving gaps for a mutation-free tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, with the main action front-loaded and each sentence adding value: the first states the purpose, the second clarifies scope and relationship to the headlines endpoint. No filler.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple parameterless tool, it covers the essential: what it returns and its connection to the headlines endpoint. It does not describe the output format (e.g., list of strings), but given the lack of output schema and simplicity, it is reasonably complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so schema coverage is complete and the description need not elaborate. The baseline for 0-parameter tools is 4, and no additional parameter semantics are required.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States the verb 'Get' and the resource 'Bleacher Report sections', clearly identifying the tool's function. The note that it returns sections accepted by the headlines endpoint adds context and distinguishes it from other section tools, though it does not explicitly name siblings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage by noting the sections are for the headlines endpoint, giving contextual purpose. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives or provide exclusions, leaving the guidance implicit.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.