Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

rebag_collections

Fetch Rebag collections as normalized JSON. Control results via page and limit parameters, with empty pages returning an empty array.

Instructions

List Rebag collections. Returns normalized collections from Rebag (https://shop.rebag.com). The storefront URL is fixed server-side. Valid empty result pages return 200 with an empty collections array.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo1-based page, defaults to 1
limitNoMaximum collections, defaults to 50 and supports up to 250

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.17.5

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the behavioral disclosure burden. It adds useful non-obvious details: collections are normalized, the storefront URL is fixed server-side, and valid empty result pages return 200 with an empty collections array. This meaningfully helps an agent predict behavior, though it does not discuss auth, rate limits, or read-only guarantees.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three concise sentences with the core action front-loaded. Every sentence adds value: the resource, the source/normalization, and a relevant edge-case behavior. There is no filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple two-optional-parameter tool and absence of an output schema, the description covers the essential invocation context: what is returned, where data comes from, and how empty pages behave. It does not explain trade-offs versus sibling tools, but the necessary call-level information is largely present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with page and limit already documented including defaults and the 250 maximum. The description adds no additional parameter semantics, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb and resource: 'List Rebag collections.' It also adds context about normalized collections from Rebag, making the tool's purpose clear. It does not explicitly contrast with sibling tools like rebag_collection_products, but the resource name and phrasing are sufficiently distinct.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies this tool is used for listing collections, but it gives no guidance on when to use it versus related Rebag tools such as rebag_collection_products or rebag_search. No exclusions, alternatives, or contextual triggers are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools