Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora MCP

Crawlora MCP

Official

rebag_collections

Retrieve Rebag storefront collections as structured JSON with pagination, so you can browse or inspect available collection listings by page.

Instructions

List Rebag collections. Returns collections from Rebag (https://shop.rebag.com). The storefront URL is fixed server-side. Valid empty result pages return 200 with an empty collections array.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo1-based page, defaults to 1
limitNoMaximum collections, defaults to 50 and supports up to 250

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.17.5

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and does disclose useful edge-case behavior: the storefront URL is fixed server-side and empty pages return 200 with an empty array. That helps an agent interpret null/empty results, but it omits read-only nature, ordering, and pagination semantics beyond the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the core action, then supporting context. No filler, though the storefront URL sentence is of marginal value to an agent that cannot change it.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple 2-param list tool with fully documented parameters and no output schema, the description covers the empty-result case but says nothing about what a collection object contains or how results are ordered. Adequate but with visible gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both page and limit are already fully documented with defaults and max values. The description adds no parameter meaning beyond the schema, which is the expected baseline when the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('List Rebag collections') and identifies the source storefront, so the agent knows exactly what it retrieves. It does not, however, distinguish itself from closely-named siblings like rebag_collection_products or rebag_page, so the sibling differentiation is left implicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says what the tool does but never states when to use it versus alternatives such as rebag_collection_products or rebag_search. There are no prerequisites, no exclusion conditions, and no routing guidance for the agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools