grailed_collection

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It does disclose the error behavior for an unknown id ('typed not-found error') and mentions it returns the full listing set, but it does not explicitly state that the operation is read-only or discuss any other behavioral traits. The name 'Get' implies a read, but the description could be more explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three concise sentences, front-loaded with the purpose, then providing parameter context and error behavior. No fluff or redundancy, making it easy for an agent to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description explains the return value ('full listing set') and error behavior. It does not mention pagination or additional details, but for a simple get-by-id operation, this is fairly complete. It covers the essential information an agent needs.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already documents the id parameter with the same description ('Collection id, from grailed-collections' own collections[].id field'). The description repeats this information without adding new semantics beyond confirming it's a numeric id. Since schema coverage is 100%, the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool gets one Grailed curated collection's listings, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from related tools like grailed_collections (which likely lists collections) and grailed_search, so an agent can easily understand what this tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies a workflow by stating the id comes from grailed-collections' collections[].id field, guiding the agent to first use grailed_collections to obtain an id. However, it does not explicitly contrast with alternatives like grailed_search or mention when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.