Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

upwork_job

Retrieve detailed information about an Upwork job posting using its ID, including budget, employment type, experience level, proposal count, and client summary.

Instructions

Get Upwork job posting detail. Returns an Upwork job posting: title, full description, employment type, budget (hourly range or fixed amount), location/remote type, experience level, duration, project type, proposal count, allowed applicant countries, and a summary of the posting client (member since, location, total spend, hires, hours, industry, company size).

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesUpwork job id, e.g. from a search result's id field

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden. "Get" and "Returns" imply a read-only detail operation, and the return fields are thoroughly disclosed, but it does not mention authentication, rate limits, invalid-id behavior, or other operational constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose is front-loaded in the first sentence, and the second sentence uses its length to enumerate return fields that would otherwise be undocumented because there is no output schema. There is no redundant or wasted text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter read tool with no output schema, the description is strong because it lists the posting details and client summary that will be returned. It could be more complete by explicitly naming the search sibling as the way to obtain the id, but it is sufficient for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the single id parameter is already documented in the schema. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema provides, making the baseline 3 appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description starts with a specific verb and resource, "Get Upwork job posting detail," and enumerates the returned fields so the tool is clearly a detail lookup rather than a search or list operation. It is readily distinguishable from siblings like upwork_search and upwork_freelancer.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the required id parameter and the schema note that the id comes from a search result, but the description itself does not explicitly say when to use this tool versus upwork_search or other siblings. It gives adequate context for a known-id detail lookup but no exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools