Fetch The Indian Express RSS section inventory to identify valid section feeds for headline retrieval.
Get The Indian Express RSS sections. Returns the public The Indian Express RSS section inventory used by the headlines endpoint.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.17.5Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full responsibility. It states that it returns a public RSS section inventory, which is transparent about the action. However, it does not disclose details about the output structure, pagination, or any potential limitations. For a simple zero-param read-only tool, this is adequate but not comprehensive.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that states the core purpose immediately and adds one meaningful clarification about the headlines endpoint. There is no redundancy or wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with no parameters and a transparent purpose, the description is mostly complete. It explains the function and its relationship to the headlines endpoint. It lacks a description of the return format, but an agent can reasonably infer a list of sections. Slight gap but acceptable given low complexity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters and an empty input schema with 100% schema description coverage. The baseline is 4 for tools with no parameters, and the description rightly does not need to add parameter details since none exist.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'The Indian Express RSS sections', and explicitly notes it is the inventory used by the headlines endpoint. This distinguishes it from other section tools (e.g., nyt_sections, apnews_sections) by naming the specific source and its role.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description only hints at usage by saying it is 'used by the headlines endpoint', which implies it should be called when a list of sections is needed for that endpoint. It does not explicitly state when to use or not use this tool, nor does it mention alternatives. Minimal but not misleading.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.