Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

allbirds_products

Retrieve products from the public Allbirds catalog by page and limit to browse listings or collect product data.

Instructions

List Allbirds products. Returns products from Allbirds's (https://www.allbirds.com) public product catalog. The storefront URL is fixed server-side. Valid empty result pages return 200 with an empty products array.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo1-based page, defaults to 1
limitNoMaximum products, defaults to 50 and supports up to 250

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.16.0

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are absent, so the description carries the behavioral burden. It usefully discloses that the storefront URL is fixed server-side (no URL input needed) and that out-of-range/empty pages return 200 with an empty products array — a genuinely helpful edge-case note. It says nothing about auth, rate limits, or result ordering, leaving gaps for an unannotated tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the purpose, and each carries distinct information (what it returns, the fixed URL, the empty-page behavior). No filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a low-complexity paginated list tool with no output schema, the description covers purpose, fixed storefront scope, and the empty-result case, and the schema fully documents pagination. Return-shape detail beyond 'products array' is thin, but the tool is simple enough that this is close to complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% (both page and limit are documented in the schema, including the 1-based default and the 250 cap). The description adds no parameter meaning beyond that, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a clear verb+resource ('List Allbirds products') and adds the scope ('Allbirds's public product catalog'). It does not differentiate itself from close siblings like allbirds_collection_products or allbirds_product, so an agent must infer that this is the unfiltered full-catalog listing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance is given. With siblings such as allbirds_collection_products, allbirds_product, and allbirds_search_suggest available, the description never says when this broad listing is the right choice versus those alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools