Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

rollingstone_sections

Get Rolling Stone's section inventory, from music to politics, including verticals and tag hubs, each with its public RSS feed.

Instructions

Get Rolling Stone sections. Returns the public Rolling Stone section inventory: every music, politics, TV & movies, and culture subsection plus the site's standalone verticals (Rolling Stone Pro, product recommendations) and tag hubs, each linking to its public RSS feed.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.17.5

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the resource is a public inventory and that each section links to its RSS feed, but doesn't cover potential behaviors like pagination, rate limits, or response structure, though the simplicity of a zero-parameter get lessens the need.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, dense sentence that front-loads the verb and resource, then enumerates content and mentions RSS links—no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter tool with no output schema, the description adequately explains what is returned (the section inventory with RSS links), so an agent can call it without missing information.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, so the schema is fully covered by default. The description adds no parameter semantics because none exist; the baseline of 4 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'Rolling Stone sections,' and enumerates the specific content (music, politics, TV & movies, culture subsections, standalone verticals, tag hubs) making it distinct from other publication section tools like newyorker_sections or nyt_sections.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description doesn't explicitly contrast with sibling tools (e.g., rollingstone_headlines, rollingstone_news) or state when not to use it, so usage guidance is implied rather than explicit. However, the scope is clear enough that an agent would only call this when needing the section inventory.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools