Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

flashscore_team_fixtures

Flashscore team fixtures. Returns one page of a team's upcoming matches, soonest first, as structured events with start time, both sides and competition. Event ids work with the flashscore match endpoints.

Instructions

Flashscore team fixtures. Returns one page of a team's upcoming matches, soonest first, as structured events with start time, both sides and competition. Event ids work with the flashscore match endpoints. Request successive pages until event_count is 0; a page past the end returns an empty list.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesEight-character Flashscore team id
pageNo1-based page from 1 to 300; defaults to 1

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.17.12

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and does well: it discloses ordering (soonest first), return shape (start time, both sides, competition), id interoperability with match endpoints, and pagination termination/empty-page behavior. It doesn't mention rate limits or auth, but for a read-only listing tool this is solid disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences, front-loaded with what the tool returns, followed by the id interoperability note and pagination rule. No filler; each sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 2-param paginated list tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description covers return content and pagination adequately. Minor gap: no explicit routing away from sibling fixture/results tools, but nothing essential for correct invocation is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds real value beyond the schema by explaining how the page parameter should be driven (iterate until event_count is 0, past-the-end returns empty list). The id semantics are already fully documented in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: returns a team's upcoming matches as structured events. The word 'upcoming' implicitly distinguishes it from flashscore_team_results (past matches), but it never names that sibling explicitly, so the differentiation is inferable rather than stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides pagination guidance ('request successive pages until event_count is 0') which tells the agent how to iterate, but gives no when-to-use versus alternatives (e.g., flashscore_team_results for finished matches, or sofascore_team_events). Usage is implied by 'upcoming' but not spelled out.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools