Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

ohpolly_products

Fetch products from Oh Polly's public catalog with page and limit filters, returning structured JSON product listings.

Instructions

List Oh Polly products. Returns products from Oh Polly's (https://www.ohpolly.com) public product catalog. The storefront URL is fixed server-side. Valid empty result pages return 200 with an empty products array.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo1-based page, defaults to 1
limitNoMaximum products, defaults to 50 and supports up to 250

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.16.0

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden, and it does add useful context: the storefront URL is fixed server-side and valid empty pages return 200 with an empty array. It leaves out pagination termination behavior, rate limits, and auth requirements, but the added details exceed what structured fields provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose and free of filler. The empty-page note is a useful concrete detail rather than padding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter list tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description covers source, fixed URL, and empty-result semantics. The main gap is the absence of any sibling routing context, which would help an agent pick correctly among the many ohpolly_* tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both page and limit with defaults and the 250 cap. The description adds no syntax or format detail beyond this, so the baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ("List Oh Polly products") and clarifies the source is the public product catalog. However, it does not differentiate from siblings like ohpolly_collection_products (products within a collection) or ohpolly_product (single product), leaving the scope of "products" slightly ambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as ohpolly_collection_products, ohpolly_store, or ohpolly_search_suggest. The description never names a sibling or a selecting condition, so the agent must infer usage from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools