Fetch current Android Police top stories with no input required, returning titles, URLs, authors, publication times, summaries, and images.
Get Android Police top stories. Returns the current Android Police top stories across the site, with no input needed. Each item has a title and URL, and may also carry the author, publication time, summary and image.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.17.9Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It usefully discloses the return shape (title, URL, and optional author/publication time/summary/image), but says nothing about caching freshness, rate limits, or result count, which would matter for a 'current top stories' feed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two tight sentences, front-loaded with the purpose and then the return contents. Minor redundancy in restating 'top stories' twice, but nothing wasteful.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema, the description compensates by enumerating the item fields, and the empty input schema is acknowledged. For a simple no-param news feed this is nearly complete; only freshness/result-count behavior is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline of 4 applies. The description correctly notes no input is needed, matching the empty schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb (Get) and resource (Android Police top stories) with clear scope ('across the site'). It does not name or differentiate from siblings like androidpolice_headlines, androidpolice_article, or androidpolice_sections, so an agent must infer the distinction.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
'with no input needed' tells the agent this is a zero-argument call, but there is no guidance on when to choose this over androidpolice_headlines, androidpolice_sections, or androidpolice_article. No exclusions or conditions are given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.