Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

coingecko_coin

Look up a cryptocurrency by coin id to return its profile, market stats, links, and categories with optional quote currency conversion.

Instructions

CoinGecko coin profile. Returns normalized CoinGecko profile, market stats, links, and categories for one coin id. This endpoint supports the documented vs_currency enum and is not intended for real-time trading.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesCoinGecko coin id such as bitcoin
vs_currencyNoQuote currency

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.17.5
    • addedInput schema / properties / vs_currency / enum
      Added value: +[
      +  "btc",
      +  "eth",
      +  "ltc",
      +  "bch",
      +  "bnb",
      +  "eos",
      +  "xrp",
      +  "xlm",
      +  "link",
      +  "dot",
      +  "yfi",
      +  "sol",
      +  "usd",
      +  "aed",
      +  "ars",
      +  "aud",
      +  "bdt",
      +  "bhd",
      +  "bmd",
      +  "brl",
      +  "cad",
      +  "chf",
      +  "clp",
      +  "cny",
      +  "czk",
      +  "dkk",
      +  "eur",
      +  "gbp",
      +  "gel",
      +  "hkd",
      +  "huf",
      +  "idr",
      +  "ils",
      +  "inr",
      +  "jpy",
      +  "krw",
      +  "kwd",
      +  "lkr",
      +  "mmk",
      +  "mxn",
      +  "myr",
      +  "ngn",
      +  "nok",
      +  "nzd",
      +  "php",
      +  "pkr",
      +  "pln",
      +  "rub",
      +  "sar",
      +  "sek",
      +  "sgd",
      +  "thb",
      +  "try",
      +  "twd",
      +  "uah",
      +  "vef",
      +  "vnd",
      +  "zar",
      +  "xdr",
      +  "xag",
      +  "xau",
      +  "bits",
      +  "sats"
      +]
  2. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the data is not real-time and that it returns normalized content, adding useful behavioral context. However, it does not mention rate limits, error conditions, or the exact structure of the 'normalized' output, leaving some gaps for a read-only tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences with no wasted words. The purpose is front-loaded, and the usage caveat is placed in the second sentence. Every sentence contributes to understanding the tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple tool (2 params, no output schema), the description adequately explains the return contents at a high level (profile, market stats, links, categories) and adds a usage caveat. It does not detail the output schema, but for a profile endpoint this is a reasonable level of detail. It could mention more about the output format, but it is sufficient for an agent to decide to call it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for both parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description only adds that it is for 'one coin id' (implying a single lookup) and references the vs_currency enum, which is already in the schema. It does not add significant meaning beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific verb ('returns') and resource ('CoinGecko profile') for one coin id, and lists the content types (profile, market stats, links, categories). This precisely distinguishes it from sibling tools like coingecko_markets or coingecko_search, making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context: it is for a single coin id and explicitly notes it is not intended for real-time trading, giving a when-not condition. However, it does not name alternative tools for other scenarios (e.g., using coingecko_markets for multiple coins), so it lacks explicit alternatives but is still helpful.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools