set_editor_layout

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the action ('switch') without mentioning side effects (e.g., current layout lost, panels rearranged) or whether it is reversible. The agent gets minimal insight into impact.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence of 10 words, front-loaded with the action. No wasted words; every element is necessary.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with one enum parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It identifies purpose and action. However, it lacks context on preconditions or effects, and could benefit from noting that layout changes are immediate and affect the editor workspace.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description ('specific workspace layout') adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's enum description ('Editor layout preset to activate'). No further detail on what each preset does.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Switch') and resource ('editor workspace layout'), directly stating the tool's function. It clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like 'load_editor_layout' (loading a saved layout) and 'reset_editor_layout' (resetting to default).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention context (e.g., 'use when you need a predefined layout') or exclude cases (e.g., 'not for custom layouts'). The sibling 'load_editor_layout' is not referenced.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.