set_audio_bus_layout

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states that the tool 'replaces' the layout, implying a destructive overwrite, but does not clarify that existing buses not in the new array are removed, or that the first bus must be 'Master' (though the schema hints this). Additional context about permissions or irreversibility is missing, but the core behavior is conveyed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded with the key action 'Replace the entire audio bus layout', making the purpose immediately clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive replacement operation with no output schema and no annotations, the description is too minimal. It lacks information about return values, side effects (e.g., does it remove all existing buses?), error conditions, or validation. Given the complexity of the bus layout, more context is needed for safe use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema coverage is 100%, with detailed descriptions for the 'buses' parameter and its sub-properties. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, merely referring to 'given bus definitions'. Baseline 3 is appropriate since the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Replace' and explicitly mentions 'the entire audio bus layout', clearly indicating the tool's action and scope. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'set_audio_bus' (which targets a single bus) and 'set_audio_bus_volume' (which modifies a single property).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'add_audio_bus', 'remove_audio_bus', or 'set_audio_bus'. It does not mention prerequisites, conditions, or that this tool replaces the entire layout (which may be destructive).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.