remove_autoload

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must bear behavioral transparency. It only states 'Remove' but does not disclose side effects (e.g., project saving, undoability, or impact on other components). For a destructive action, more detail is needed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, 7 words, no fluff. Front-loads action and object. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple removal tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is fairly complete. Could mention the format of the name or that it must match an existing autoload, but the schema description partially covers that.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides description for the 'name' parameter ('Autoload name to remove'). The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema supplies. Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Remove'), the resource ('autoload singleton'), and context ('from the project'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'add_autoload' and 'get_autoloads'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool (e.g., after adding autoloads, to clean up) or when not to (e.g., if the autoload is needed). Does not reference sibling tools for checking existing autoloads.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.