remove_audio_player
Removes an audio player node from the scene using its node path.
Instructions
Remove an audio player node from the scene
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| node_path | Yes | Path to the audio player node to remove |
Removes an audio player node from the scene using its node path.
Remove an audio player node from the scene
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| node_path | Yes | Path to the audio player node to remove |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It only states the action without disclosing side effects, undo behavior, or permissions needed for a destructive operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, clear sentence with no extraneous words. Efficiently conveys the tool's purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple 1-parameter tool, the description is sufficient. Could mention node type constraints or path format, but not strictly necessary given the schema detail.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, and the description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides for the node_path parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (remove) and the resource (audio player node from the scene), distinguishing it from siblings like add_audio_player and remove_audio_bus.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives or prerequisites. Sibling tools like remove_audio_bus or add_audio_player are not differentiated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/KeeVeeG/godot-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server