google_ads_sitelinks_remove

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses destructive nature (unlinks, stops serving), non-deletion of asset, and return value (resource_name). Lacks details on error handling or prerequisites, but with no annotations, it provides sufficient transparency for a removal operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences: main action, behavioral note, and usage guidance. No redundancy, efficient structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers main behavior, return value, and parameter sourcing. Lacks output schema but mentions return value. Could include error cases, but overall complete for detach operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and description adds value by explaining optional fallback for customer_id, and how to obtain campaign_id and asset_id from other tools. This goes beyond the schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool detaches a sitelink asset from a campaign by removing the CampaignAsset link, distinguishing it from deletion of the asset itself. The verb 'detach' is specific and differentiates from sibling tools like google_ads_callouts_remove.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit guidance on when to use (detach sitelink), what not to do (does not delete asset), and alternatives: re-linking via google_ads_sitelinks_create and listing via google_ads_sitelinks_list. Also provides how to obtain IDs from other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.