Skip to main content
Glama

google_ads_sitelinks_remove

Detach a sitelink asset from a Google Ads campaign. Removes the association so the sitelink stops serving, without deleting the asset itself.

Instructions

Detach a sitelink asset from a Google Ads campaign by removing the CampaignAsset link. Returns {resource_name} of the removed campaign-asset association. Destructive — unlinks the asset from the campaign so it stops serving, but does not delete the underlying Asset row. Re-linking requires google_ads_sitelinks_create with the same text/URL. To list current sitelinks use google_ads_sitelinks_list.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
asset_idYesAsset ID as a numeric string (e.g. '123456789'). Obtain from the 'id' field of google_ads_sitelinks_list rows where level=='campaign'.
campaign_idYesCampaign ID as a numeric string without dashes (e.g. '23743184133'). Obtain via google_ads_campaigns_list.
customer_idNoGoogle Ads customer ID as a 10-digit string without dashes (e.g. '1234567890'). Optional — falls back to GOOGLE_ADS_CUSTOMER_ID / GOOGLE_ADS_LOGIN_CUSTOMER_ID from the configured credentials when omitted.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that operation is destructive, stops serving, does not delete underlying asset, and returns resource_name. Lacks authentication or rate limit context, but given no annotations, this is strong.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, no waste, front-loaded with key action and outcome. Efficient and clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, behavior, side effects, return value, and references related tools. No missing elements for a removal operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

100% schema coverage and description adds crucial context: asset_id source (list with level=='campaign'), customer_id fallback. Goes beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states verb 'Detach', resource 'CampaignAsset', and differentiates from create/list tools. Specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit when-to-use and alternatives: destructive but asset remains, re-linking with create, listing before removal. Comprehensive guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/logly/mureo'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server