Skip to main content
Glama
logly

mureo

by logly
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

google_ads_rsa_assets_audit

Audit Responsive Search Ad headlines and descriptions against Google's quantity and quality guidance, then get prioritized replacement recommendations without modifying any assets.

Instructions

Audit Responsive Search Ad assets against Google's quantity and quality guidance and emit replacement recommendations. Returns {campaign_id, period, headline_count, description_count, label_distribution:{:count}, best_headlines, worst_headlines, best_descriptions, worst_descriptions, recommendations:[{type ('add_headlines'|'add_descriptions'|'replace_headline'|'replace_description'|'wait_for_data'), priority ('HIGH'|'MEDIUM'|'LOW'), message, asset_text?, performance_label?}], recommendation_count}. HIGH priorities fire when headlines < 8 or descriptions < 3. LOW 'wait_for_data' fires when LEARNING+UNKNOWN > 50% of assets. Read-only; does not modify any assets. For the raw per-asset performance breakdown use google_ads_rsa_assets_analyze.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
periodNoReporting window for the metrics. Default 'LAST_30_DAYS'. Use a shorter window (LAST_7_DAYS / LAST_14_DAYS) when diagnosing recent changes; use LAST_90_DAYS for trend baselines. Also accepts an explicit range — "YYYY-MM-DD..YYYY-MM-DD" (the spelling Meta Ads takes too) or, in GAQL spelling, "BETWEEN 'YYYY-MM-DD' AND 'YYYY-MM-DD'" — both endpoints inclusive, in the account's time zone, for a window no trailing constant can reach (e.g. a single past calendar month). One asymmetry to know about: every constant except LAST_90_DAYS is resolved by Google Ads in the account's reporting time zone, whereas LAST_90_DAYS has no API constant and is expanded by mureo into the 90 days ending yesterday **on the server's date**, so its edges can differ by a day when the server and the account are in different zones. Pass an explicit range when the exact boundary matters.
campaign_idYesCampaign ID as a numeric string without dashes (e.g. '23743184133'). Obtain via google_ads_campaigns_list.
customer_idNoGoogle Ads customer ID as a 10-digit string without dashes (e.g. '1234567890'). Optional — falls back to GOOGLE_ADS_CUSTOMER_ID / GOOGLE_ADS_LOGIN_CUSTOMER_ID from the configured credentials when omitted.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.33.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / period / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
-  {
-    "enum": [
-      "TODAY",
-      "YESTERDAY",
-      "THIS_WEEK_SUN_TODAY",
-      "THIS_WEEK_MON_TODAY",
-      "LAST_BUSINESS_WEEK",
-      "LAST_WEEK_SUN_SAT",
-      "LAST_WEEK_MON_SUN",
-      "LAST_7_DAYS",
-      "LAST_14_DAYS",
-      "LAST_30_DAYS",
-      "LAST_90_DAYS",
-      "THIS_MONTH",
-      "LAST_MONTH"
-    ],
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "pattern": "\\ABETWEEN '([0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2})' AND '([0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2})'\\Z",
-    "type": "string"
-  }
-]New value: +[
+  {
+    "enum": [
+      "TODAY",
+      "YESTERDAY",
+      "THIS_WEEK_SUN_TODAY",
+      "THIS_WEEK_MON_TODAY",
+      "LAST_BUSINESS_WEEK",
+      "LAST_WEEK_SUN_SAT",
+      "LAST_WEEK_MON_SUN",
+      "LAST_7_DAYS",
+      "LAST_14_DAYS",
+      "LAST_30_DAYS",
+      "LAST_90_DAYS",
+      "THIS_MONTH",
+      "LAST_MONTH"
+    ],
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  {
+    "pattern": "\\ABETWEEN '([0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2})' AND '([0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2})'\\Z",
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  {
+    "pattern": "\\A([0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2})\\.\\.([0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2})\\Z",
+    "type": "string"
+  }
+]
    • changedInput schema / properties / period / description
      Previous value: -"Reporting window for the metrics. Default 'LAST_30_DAYS'. Use a shorter window (LAST_7_DAYS / LAST_14_DAYS) when diagnosing recent changes; use LAST_90_DAYS for trend baselines. Also accepts an explicit range in GAQL spelling — \"BETWEEN 'YYYY-MM-DD' AND 'YYYY-MM-DD'\", both endpoints inclusive, in the account's time zone — for a window no trailing constant can reach (e.g. a single past calendar month). One asymmetry to know about: every constant except LAST_90_DAYS is resolved by Google Ads in the account's reporting time zone, whereas LAST_90_DAYS has no API constant and is expanded by mureo into the 90 days ending yesterday **on the server's date**, so its edges can differ by a day when the server and the account are in different zones. Pass an explicit range when the exact boundary matters."New value: +"Reporting window for the metrics. Default 'LAST_30_DAYS'. Use a shorter window (LAST_7_DAYS / LAST_14_DAYS) when diagnosing recent changes; use LAST_90_DAYS for trend baselines. Also accepts an explicit range — \"YYYY-MM-DD..YYYY-MM-DD\" (the spelling Meta Ads takes too) or, in GAQL spelling, \"BETWEEN 'YYYY-MM-DD' AND 'YYYY-MM-DD'\" — both endpoints inclusive, in the account's time zone, for a window no trailing constant can reach (e.g. a single past calendar month). One asymmetry to know about: every constant except LAST_90_DAYS is resolved by Google Ads in the account's reporting time zone, whereas LAST_90_DAYS has no API constant and is expanded by mureo into the 90 days ending yesterday **on the server's date**, so its edges can differ by a day when the server and the account are in different zones. Pass an explicit range when the exact boundary matters."
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.17.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / period / anyOf
      Added value: +[
+  {
+    "enum": [
+      "TODAY",
+      "YESTERDAY",
+      "THIS_WEEK_SUN_TODAY",
+      "THIS_WEEK_MON_TODAY",
+      "LAST_BUSINESS_WEEK",
+      "LAST_WEEK_SUN_SAT",
+      "LAST_WEEK_MON_SUN",
+      "LAST_7_DAYS",
+      "LAST_14_DAYS",
+      "LAST_30_DAYS",
+      "LAST_90_DAYS",
+      "THIS_MONTH",
+      "LAST_MONTH"
+    ],
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  {
+    "pattern": "\\ABETWEEN '([0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2})' AND '([0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2})'\\Z",
+    "type": "string"
+  }
+]
    • changedInput schema / properties / period / description
      Previous value: -"Reporting window for the metrics. Default 'LAST_30_DAYS'. Use a shorter window (LAST_7_DAYS / LAST_14_DAYS) when diagnosing recent changes; use LAST_90_DAYS for trend baselines."New value: +"Reporting window for the metrics. Default 'LAST_30_DAYS'. Use a shorter window (LAST_7_DAYS / LAST_14_DAYS) when diagnosing recent changes; use LAST_90_DAYS for trend baselines. Also accepts an explicit range in GAQL spelling — \"BETWEEN 'YYYY-MM-DD' AND 'YYYY-MM-DD'\", both endpoints inclusive, in the account's time zone — for a window no trailing constant can reach (e.g. a single past calendar month). One asymmetry to know about: every constant except LAST_90_DAYS is resolved by Google Ads in the account's reporting time zone, whereas LAST_90_DAYS has no API constant and is expanded by mureo into the 90 days ending yesterday **on the server's date**, so its edges can differ by a day when the server and the account are in different zones. Pass an explicit range when the exact boundary matters."
    • removedInput schema / properties / period / enum
      Removed value: -[
-  "TODAY",
-  "YESTERDAY",
-  "LAST_7_DAYS",
-  "LAST_14_DAYS",
-  "LAST_30_DAYS",
-  "LAST_90_DAYS",
-  "THIS_MONTH",
-  "LAST_MONTH"
-]
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv0.10.37
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  4. Addedv0.9.12
  5. Removedv0.9.6
  6. Addedv0.9.2
  7. Removedv0.9.1
  8. Addedv1.0.5

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are supplied, so the description carries the full burden, and it does: 'Read-only; does not modify any assets' covers the safety profile, and it discloses the scoring logic that drives recommendations, which an agent otherwise could not infer. It omits operational behavior such as rate limits, pagination, or what happens on a campaign with no RSA assets, leaving a gap for a zero-annotation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the purpose, then the return shape, then the thresholds, then the read-only reassurance and sibling pointer — a sensible priority order with no filler. The inline return-shape enumeration is dense but every field listed carries decision value for the agent, so it earns its length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, yet the description fully enumerates the response shape including the recommendation object's type, priority, and optional fields. Combined with the threshold rules, the read-only guarantee, and the sibling pointer, an agent has everything needed to invoke and interpret the result.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the period field already documents the constants, the explicit-range spellings, and the LAST_90_DAYS time-zone asymmetry, so the description correctly leaves parameters to the schema. It adds no parameter-level meaning of its own, making the baseline 3 appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Opens with a specific verb+resource ('Audit Responsive Search Ad assets') and the output it produces ('emit replacement recommendations'). It explicitly distinguishes itself from the sibling google_ads_rsa_assets_analyze by scope (guidance audit vs. raw per-asset performance), so an agent can choose between them without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives concrete conditions for the audit's outputs (HIGH fires when headlines < 8 or descriptions < 3; LOW 'wait_for_data' when LEARNING+UNKNOWN > 50%) and routes the agent to google_ads_rsa_assets_analyze for raw performance data. It stops short of stating when not to run this audit at all (e.g. campaigns with no RSA), so a 4 rather than a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools