Skip to main content
Glama

meta_ads_lead_forms_get

Retrieve the full details of a Meta lead form, including question definitions and legal pages, to map field keys for CRM sync.

Instructions

Fetches the full detail record for a single lead form, including its question definitions and legal pages. Returns id, name, status, locale, questions (array with type / key / label per question), privacy_policy ({url, link_text?}) and the legacy privacy_policy_url flat field, follow_up_action_url, leads_count, and created_time. Read-only. Call this before designing downstream CRM sync so you know the exact field keys to map.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
account_idNoMeta Ads account ID in the format 'act_XXXXXXXXXX' (e.g. 'act_1234567890'). Optional — falls back to META_ADS_ACCOUNT_ID from the configured credentials. The leading 'act_' prefix is required.
form_idYesLead form ID as returned by meta_ads_lead_forms_list.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries burden. States 'Read-only' and details all returned fields. Lacks mention of authentication needs or rate limits, but the behavioral disclosure is solid.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise single paragraph, front-loaded with purpose and field list. Every sentence adds value with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple nature of a fetch operation and no output schema, the description fully covers what the tool does, what it returns, and its usage context for CRM mapping.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with good descriptions. The description adds minimal value beyond the schema, such as hinting that form_id comes from list, but not enough to exceed baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it fetches the full detail record for a single lead form, listing specific fields. The verb 'Fetches' and resource 'lead form' are precise, and it distinguishes from the list sibling by focusing on a single record.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says to call this before designing downstream CRM sync, providing clear context. Does not explicitly state when not to use, but the guidance is strong enough for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/logly/mureo'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server