Skip to main content
Glama

google_ads_rsa_assets_analyze

Split Responsive Search Ad metrics by headline and description to compare asset impressions, clicks, conversions, cost, and CTR and surface optimization insights.

Instructions

Split Responsive Search Ad asset performance within a Google Ads campaign into headlines and descriptions. Returns {campaign_id, period, headlines:[{text, performance_label ('BEST'|'GOOD'|'LOW'|'POOR'|'LEARNING'|'PENDING'|'UNKNOWN'), impressions, clicks, conversions, cost, ctr (percent)}], descriptions (same shape), best_headlines (performance_label == 'BEST'), worst_headlines ('LOW'|'POOR'), best_descriptions, worst_descriptions, insights:[strings]}. Rows sorted by impressions descending. Read-only. For an audit version with replacement recommendations use google_ads_rsa_assets_audit; for ad-level A/B use google_ads_ad_performance_compare.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
periodNoReporting window for the metrics. Default 'LAST_30_DAYS'. Use a shorter window (LAST_7_DAYS / LAST_14_DAYS) when diagnosing recent changes; use LAST_90_DAYS for trend baselines. Also accepts an explicit range — "YYYY-MM-DD..YYYY-MM-DD" (the spelling Meta Ads takes too) or, in GAQL spelling, "BETWEEN 'YYYY-MM-DD' AND 'YYYY-MM-DD'" — both endpoints inclusive, in the account's time zone, for a window no trailing constant can reach (e.g. a single past calendar month). One asymmetry to know about: every constant except LAST_90_DAYS is resolved by Google Ads in the account's reporting time zone, whereas LAST_90_DAYS has no API constant and is expanded by mureo into the 90 days ending yesterday **on the server's date**, so its edges can differ by a day when the server and the account are in different zones. Pass an explicit range when the exact boundary matters.
campaign_idYesCampaign ID as a numeric string without dashes (e.g. '23743184133'). Obtain via google_ads_campaigns_list.
customer_idNoGoogle Ads customer ID as a 10-digit string without dashes (e.g. '1234567890'). Optional — falls back to GOOGLE_ADS_CUSTOMER_ID / GOOGLE_ADS_LOGIN_CUSTOMER_ID from the configured credentials when omitted.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.33.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / period / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "enum": [
      -      "TODAY",
      -      "YESTERDAY",
      -      "THIS_WEEK_SUN_TODAY",
      -      "THIS_WEEK_MON_TODAY",
      -      "LAST_BUSINESS_WEEK",
      -      "LAST_WEEK_SUN_SAT",
      -      "LAST_WEEK_MON_SUN",
      -      "LAST_7_DAYS",
      -      "LAST_14_DAYS",
      -      "LAST_30_DAYS",
      -      "LAST_90_DAYS",
      -      "THIS_MONTH",
      -      "LAST_MONTH"
      -    ],
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "pattern": "\\ABETWEEN '([0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2})' AND '([0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2})'\\Z",
      -    "type": "string"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "enum": [
      +      "TODAY",
      +      "YESTERDAY",
      +      "THIS_WEEK_SUN_TODAY",
      +      "THIS_WEEK_MON_TODAY",
      +      "LAST_BUSINESS_WEEK",
      +      "LAST_WEEK_SUN_SAT",
      +      "LAST_WEEK_MON_SUN",
      +      "LAST_7_DAYS",
      +      "LAST_14_DAYS",
      +      "LAST_30_DAYS",
      +      "LAST_90_DAYS",
      +      "THIS_MONTH",
      +      "LAST_MONTH"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "pattern": "\\ABETWEEN '([0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2})' AND '([0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2})'\\Z",
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "pattern": "\\A([0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2})\\.\\.([0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2})\\Z",
      +    "type": "string"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / period / description
      Previous value: -"Reporting window for the metrics. Default 'LAST_30_DAYS'. Use a shorter window (LAST_7_DAYS / LAST_14_DAYS) when diagnosing recent changes; use LAST_90_DAYS for trend baselines. Also accepts an explicit range in GAQL spelling — \"BETWEEN 'YYYY-MM-DD' AND 'YYYY-MM-DD'\", both endpoints inclusive, in the account's time zone — for a window no trailing constant can reach (e.g. a single past calendar month). One asymmetry to know about: every constant except LAST_90_DAYS is resolved by Google Ads in the account's reporting time zone, whereas LAST_90_DAYS has no API constant and is expanded by mureo into the 90 days ending yesterday **on the server's date**, so its edges can differ by a day when the server and the account are in different zones. Pass an explicit range when the exact boundary matters."New value: +"Reporting window for the metrics. Default 'LAST_30_DAYS'. Use a shorter window (LAST_7_DAYS / LAST_14_DAYS) when diagnosing recent changes; use LAST_90_DAYS for trend baselines. Also accepts an explicit range — \"YYYY-MM-DD..YYYY-MM-DD\" (the spelling Meta Ads takes too) or, in GAQL spelling, \"BETWEEN 'YYYY-MM-DD' AND 'YYYY-MM-DD'\" — both endpoints inclusive, in the account's time zone, for a window no trailing constant can reach (e.g. a single past calendar month). One asymmetry to know about: every constant except LAST_90_DAYS is resolved by Google Ads in the account's reporting time zone, whereas LAST_90_DAYS has no API constant and is expanded by mureo into the 90 days ending yesterday **on the server's date**, so its edges can differ by a day when the server and the account are in different zones. Pass an explicit range when the exact boundary matters."
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.17.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / period / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "enum": [
      +      "TODAY",
      +      "YESTERDAY",
      +      "THIS_WEEK_SUN_TODAY",
      +      "THIS_WEEK_MON_TODAY",
      +      "LAST_BUSINESS_WEEK",
      +      "LAST_WEEK_SUN_SAT",
      +      "LAST_WEEK_MON_SUN",
      +      "LAST_7_DAYS",
      +      "LAST_14_DAYS",
      +      "LAST_30_DAYS",
      +      "LAST_90_DAYS",
      +      "THIS_MONTH",
      +      "LAST_MONTH"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "pattern": "\\ABETWEEN '([0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2})' AND '([0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2})'\\Z",
      +    "type": "string"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / period / description
      Previous value: -"Reporting window for the metrics. Default 'LAST_30_DAYS'. Use a shorter window (LAST_7_DAYS / LAST_14_DAYS) when diagnosing recent changes; use LAST_90_DAYS for trend baselines."New value: +"Reporting window for the metrics. Default 'LAST_30_DAYS'. Use a shorter window (LAST_7_DAYS / LAST_14_DAYS) when diagnosing recent changes; use LAST_90_DAYS for trend baselines. Also accepts an explicit range in GAQL spelling — \"BETWEEN 'YYYY-MM-DD' AND 'YYYY-MM-DD'\", both endpoints inclusive, in the account's time zone — for a window no trailing constant can reach (e.g. a single past calendar month). One asymmetry to know about: every constant except LAST_90_DAYS is resolved by Google Ads in the account's reporting time zone, whereas LAST_90_DAYS has no API constant and is expanded by mureo into the 90 days ending yesterday **on the server's date**, so its edges can differ by a day when the server and the account are in different zones. Pass an explicit range when the exact boundary matters."
    • removedInput schema / properties / period / enum
      Removed value: -[
      -  "TODAY",
      -  "YESTERDAY",
      -  "LAST_7_DAYS",
      -  "LAST_14_DAYS",
      -  "LAST_30_DAYS",
      -  "LAST_90_DAYS",
      -  "THIS_MONTH",
      -  "LAST_MONTH"
      -]
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv0.10.37
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  4. Addedv0.9.12
  5. Removedv0.9.6
  6. Addedv0.9.2
  7. Removedv0.9.1
  8. Addedv1.0.5

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden and does well: it declares 'Read-only', discloses the full return shape, the sort order (impressions descending), and the performance_label taxonomy. It stops short of stating auth/credential requirements or rate limits, so not a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the action, followed by the return contract and then sibling routing — no filler sentences. The dense return-shape enumeration earns its space because no output schema exists.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema and no annotations, yet the description supplies the exact return object keys, label enum values, derived subsets (best_/worst_), and sorting behavior. An agent has everything needed to call and interpret it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the period/campaign_id/customer_id semantics, including range spellings and the LAST_90_DAYS timezone caveat, live in the schema. The description adds no parameter-level guidance beyond what is already structured, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Split Responsive Search Ad asset performance ... into headlines and descriptions') with explicit campaign scoping, and names the two nearest siblings it replaces. An agent can distinguish it from google_ads_rsa_assets_audit and google_ads_ad_performance_compare without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes between alternatives: audit-with-recommendations goes to google_ads_rsa_assets_audit, ad-level A/B goes to google_ads_ad_performance_compare. The remaining case (this tool) is therefore unambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools