creative_studio_brand_kit_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description bears full burden. It discloses source (./BRAND_KIT/kit.yml), fallback behavior (returns defaults with 'defaults_used' true), and the data returned. This is comprehensive for a read tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two efficient sentences: first states purpose and source, second explains fallback and usage guidance. No wasted words, front-loaded with most important information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, but description adequately explains return values (colour, fonts, logo path, clear-space, and 'defaults_used' flag). Also provides usage context for composing banners. Could mention if file is always read fresh, but sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist (0 params, schema coverage 100%). Baseline 4 applies; description adds no parameter info as none needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'Return' and resource 'loaded brand kit' with specific fields (colours, fonts, logo path, logo clear-space). Distinguishes from siblings like creative_studio_compose by stating 'Use this to judge brand fit before composing banners.'

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description explicitly advises: 'Use this to judge brand fit before composing banners.' This provides clear context for when to use the tool, though it does not mention when not to use or list alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.