ue_sequence_info

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses what information is returned (bindings, tracks, sections, channels, indices) but does not mention side effects, error behavior, or path requirements. As a read-only info tool, the lack of safety warnings is somewhat mitigated, but more detail would be better.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, and no wasted words. It efficiently conveys both what the tool does and when to use it.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with one parameter and no output schema. The description covers what info is returned and the timing of use. It doesn't specify the exact return format, but for a simple info tool, the key details are present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description doesn't mention sequence_path at all. The parameter name gives a hint, but no path format, examples, or guidance are provided, so the description fails to compensate for the schema's lack of detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool provides bindings, tracks, sections, and channels of a Level Sequence, and explains it reveals channel names and track/section indices. It distinguishes itself from sibling sequence tools (e.g., ue_sequence_add_key, ue_sequence_add_track) by focusing on metadata retrieval.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs to call it before adding keys ('Chiamalo prima di mettere chiavi') and explains it's the way to know channel names and indices. No alternatives are named, but the context makes the usage clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.