Skip to main content
Glama

project_delay_warning

Send a proactive email warning a client that a deadline is at risk, before it's missed, to give them time to adjust and demonstrate project oversight.

Instructions

Write a proactive email warning a client that a deadline is at risk — BEFORE you've actually missed it. The professional middle path between staying silent (and surprising them) and over-apologising (when you're not late yet). Demonstrates that you're on top of the project and gives the client time to adjust. Different from late_delivery_apology (which is sent after you've already missed the deadline). Does not count against your monthly draft limit.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
client_nameYesThe client's first name
project_nameYesThe project or deliverable at risk (e.g. 'the brand guidelines', 'the v2 API integration', 'the homepage redesign')
original_deadlineYesThe agreed delivery date (e.g. 'Friday June 13', 'end of this week')
expected_delayYesHow much of a delay you're expecting (e.g. '2–3 days', 'about a week', 'until Monday')
reasonNoOptional: a brief, honest reason for the delay (e.g. 'a dependency on the client's API took longer than expected', 'a family situation came up'). Keep to one sentence. Omit if no clean reason.
new_delivery_dateNoOptional: the specific new date you're committing to (e.g. 'Tuesday June 17'). Include if you know it; omit if you need a day to confirm.
your_nameNoOptional: your name for the sign-off
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Describes the tool as proactive, professional, and not counting against monthly draft limit. Indicates it is a write operation but without destructive consequences. Lacks detail on whether email is sent immediately or drafted, but sufficient for understanding.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is concise with three sentences, front-loading the purpose. Every sentence adds value (purpose, when to use, sibling distinction, monthly limit). Could be slightly more streamlined, but no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and 7 parameters (4 required), the description provides sufficient context: purpose, timing, differentiation from sibling, and an operational detail (draft limit). Lacks info about return value or side effects, but adequate for agent decision.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add additional meaning beyond the schema; it provides context for the tool's purpose but does not elaborate on individual parameters. Adequate but not exceptional.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool writes a proactive warning email before a deadline is missed, using specific verbs 'Write a proactive email warning'. It distinguishes from sibling 'late_delivery_apology' by specifying timing (before vs after missing deadline).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use (BEFORE actually missed deadline) and when not to ('Different from late_delivery_apology'). Provides context: 'professional middle path between staying silent and over-apologising', giving clear guidance on appropriate usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jabbawocky/proposalcraft'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server