autotask_get_product
Retrieve a specific product from Autotask using its unique ID for quick access to product details.
Instructions
Get a specific product by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| productId | Yes | The product ID to retrieve |
Retrieve a specific product from Autotask using its unique ID for quick access to product details.
Get a specific product by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| productId | Yes | The product ID to retrieve |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It only says 'Get a specific product by ID', omitting any details about authentication, error handling on missing IDs, or what the response includes. This is minimal behavioral disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence that is concise, front-loaded, and directly states the purpose with no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple with one parameter and no output schema. The description is adequate for a basic get-by-ID operation but lacks information on what is returned or potential errors, making it slightly incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% and the description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's 'productId' description. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get'), resource ('product'), and method ('by ID'), which effectively distinguishes it from the sibling tool 'autotask_search_products' that returns product lists.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'autotask_search_products'. The description implies usage when you have a specific product ID, but does not explicitly state this or mention any exclusion criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wyre-technology/autotask-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server