podcast_trending

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description should disclose authentication requirements, rate limits, or data scope. It only states the basic function, omitting important behavioral details like the fact that api_key and api_secret are parameters (even if optional) and what the 'max' and 'lang' parameters control.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one short sentence, which is under-specified for a tool with 4 parameters and no annotations. It is concise but insufficient for effective use.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 0% schema coverage, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain parameters, return values, or authentication, leaving the agent with insufficient context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to the parameters. Parameters like 'max', 'lang', 'api_key', 'api_secret' are not explained at all.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get') and the specific resource ('trending podcasts') from a source ('Podcast Index'), which is distinct from sibling tools like 'podcast_search' or 'podcast_get_episodes'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus other podcast tools, nor are there prerequisites or context for typical usage scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.