sentry_action

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only lists actions without mentioning authentication (though auth_token is required), rate limits, mutation effects (e.g., resolve_issue changes state), or idempotency. The agent lacks critical context about side effects and safety.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that packs all actions together, which is concise but not well-structured. It front-loads 'Sentry REST API' but lacks clear separation of actions or parameter relationships. Could be improved with bullet points or action-specific notes.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema, so the description should explain return values or behavior per action. It does not. Additionally, with 9 parameters (2 required) and multiple actions, the description should clarify which parameters are needed for each action, but it provides no such guidance. Completeness is insufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides 100% coverage for all 9 parameters with descriptions. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already offers; it merely lists actions. Given the high schema coverage, the baseline is 3, and the description does not elevate it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool interacts with the Sentry REST API and enumerates specific actions: list projects, list issues, get issue details, list events, and resolve issues. It uniquely identifies the resource (Sentry) and differentiates from sibling tools like github_action or gitlab_action by domain.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. It does not specify prerequisites, required parameters per action, or recommend alternatives. The agent must infer usage from the schema alone, which is insufficient for a tool with multiple actions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.