cmc_quotes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description does not disclose behavioral traits such as authentication requirements (api_key), behavior when no symbol/id is given, rate limits, or response format. The minimal description leaves the agent without critical usage context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is highly concise, but at the expense of completeness. While front-loaded, it lacks necessary detail. Not excessively wordy, but could expand with key usage notes.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 4 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is severely incomplete. It fails to specify which parameters are required, what the output looks like, or how to use the tool effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description should compensate by explaining parameters. It does not mention that 'symbol' and 'id' are alternative identifiers for the cryptocurrency, 'convert' specifies a fiat currency for conversion, and 'api_key' is required for authentication. No value added beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get') and resource ('cryptocurrency quotes from CoinMarketCap'), distinguishing it from siblings like cmc_info (detailed info) and cmc_listings (listings). However, it could be more specific about what 'quotes' entails (e.g., current price, market cap, volume).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives (e.g., cmc_info for detailed coin data, crypto_price for generic quotes). No context on required parameters (symbol or id) or how to choose between them.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.