mb_search_releases
Search MusicBrainz for albums and releases using a query and optional artist filter.
Instructions
Search for releases/albums on MusicBrainz.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | ||
| artist | No | ||
| limit | No |
Search MusicBrainz for albums and releases using a query and optional artist filter.
Search for releases/albums on MusicBrainz.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | ||
| artist | No | ||
| limit | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description fails to disclose behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, rate limits, or search behavior (e.g., fuzzy vs exact match).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise and front-loaded, but overly minimal. Lacks structure for additional helpful details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and 0% parameter coverage, description is insufficient for agent to understand return format, pagination, or search behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%; description adds no meaning beyond bare parameter names. Parameters 'query', 'artist', and 'limit' are undocumented in both schema and description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states action ('Search') and resource ('releases/albums') on MusicBrainz, distinguishing it from sibling tools like mb_get_release or mb_search_artists.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus sibling search tools (e.g., mb_search_recordings, mb_search_artists). Missing context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/malamutemayhem/unclick'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server