bungie_get_profile
Retrieve a Destiny 2 player profile by providing membership type and ID.
Instructions
Get a Destiny 2 player profile.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| membershipType | Yes | ||
| membershipId | Yes | ||
| api_key | No |
Retrieve a Destiny 2 player profile by providing membership type and ID.
Get a Destiny 2 player profile.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| membershipType | Yes | ||
| membershipId | Yes | ||
| api_key | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether the tool is read-only, required authentication (api_key is in schema but not mentioned), or any limitations. The minimal description fails to compensate for missing annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, which is very concise, but it sacrifices necessary detail. It could be slightly expanded without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema, annotations, and parameter descriptions, the tool description is woefully inadequate. It does not explain how to obtain the required IDs, the role of api_key, or what the response contains.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage and no parameter explanations in the description, the meaning of membershipType (e.g., platform codes) and membershipId format is left entirely to the agent. The description adds no value beyond the parameter names.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'Destiny 2 player profile', making the tool's purpose immediately understandable. It distinguishes from siblings like bungie_get_manifest and bungie_search_player.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like bungie_search_player, nor any prerequisites like obtaining membershipId from a prior search. The description lacks context for proper selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/malamutemayhem/unclick'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server