stripe_products
List Stripe products using your secret key. Filter by active status, limit results, or paginate.
Instructions
List Stripe products.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| secret_key | Yes | ||
| limit | No | ||
| starting_after | No | ||
| active | No |
List Stripe products using your secret key. Filter by active status, limit results, or paginate.
List Stripe products.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| secret_key | Yes | ||
| limit | No | ||
| starting_after | No | ||
| active | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits. For example, it does not mention that it supports pagination (via limit and starting_after), nor does it explain the authentication requirement or rate limits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise but at the cost of necessary detail. It only provides a basic purpose without any additional context, making it under-specified.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has 4 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is severely incomplete. It fails to explain pagination, filtering, authentication, or return format, leaving the agent with insufficient information.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no information about the parameters. The agent must infer the meaning of secret_key, limit, starting_after, and active from their names alone, which is insufficient for correct usage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'List Stripe products' clearly states the verb and resource, and it distinguishes the tool from sibling tools like stripe_charges, stripe_customers, etc., which target other Stripe resources.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It is implied that this is for listing products, but there is no mention of when not to use it or what other tools might be better for specific tasks.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/malamutemayhem/unclick'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server