gumroad_get_sale
Retrieve details of a specific Gumroad sale using its sale ID and API key.
Instructions
Get details for a single Gumroad sale by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| api_key | Yes | Gumroad access token | |
| sale_id | Yes | Sale ID |
Retrieve details of a specific Gumroad sale using its sale ID and API key.
Get details for a single Gumroad sale by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| api_key | Yes | Gumroad access token | |
| sale_id | Yes | Sale ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description lacks disclosure of behavioral traits like authentication needs (though api_key is in schema), rate limits, or what 'details' entails. No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden but provides minimal information.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that front-loads the purpose. It is efficient but could include more context without harming conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read tool with 2 parameters and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks mention of return value structure or any behavioral notes, making it slightly incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with both parameters described. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline of 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'single Gumroad sale by ID', which distinguishes it from sibling tools like gumroad_list_sales (multiple sales) and gumroad_get_product (different resource).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as gumroad_list_sales for listing sales or other tools. No prerequisites or context for usage are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/malamutemayhem/unclick'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server