podcast_search_episodes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not mention that this is a read-only operation, nor does it indicate authentication requirements (despite api_key and api_secret in the schema), rate limits, pagination, or output format. The description is insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no wasted words. Key information is front-loaded. However, it could include more detail without sacrificing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and zero parameter schema coverage, the description is extremely incomplete. It does not explain what the search returns, how to authenticate, or the meaning of any parameters. The agent is left with very little to work with.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero description coverage, and the description adds no information about the parameters. The agent has no clue what 'q', 'max', 'api_key', or 'api_secret' mean or how to use them correctly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Search', the resource 'podcast episodes', and the platform 'Podcast Index'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'podcast_get_episodes' and 'podcast_search'. However, it could be more specific about the type of search (text query).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'podcast_get_episodes' or 'podcast_search'. There are no exclusions, prerequisites, or context about typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.