email_delete
Delete an email by its unique ID to remove unwanted messages from your inbox.
Instructions
Delete an email by UID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uid | Yes | ||
| folder | No | ||
| No | |||
| password | No |
Delete an email by its unique ID to remove unwanted messages from your inbox.
Delete an email by UID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uid | Yes | ||
| folder | No | ||
| No | |||
| password | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as permanence of deletion, side effects, or required permissions. For a destructive tool, this is a significant gap.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence with no wasted words, but it is overly minimal and lacks important details, bordering on under-specification.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no annotations, no output schema, and 4 parameters mostly undocumented, the description fails to provide sufficient context for correct tool usage, especially for a destructive operation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 4 parameters (uid, folder, email, password) with no descriptions, and the description only mentions uid. The purpose of folder, email, and password is left entirely unexplained.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (Delete), the resource (email), and the identifier (UID). It is specific and distinguishes from sibling tools like email_get or email_send.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies that you need the UID to delete, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/malamutemayhem/unclick'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server