lego_search_parts
Find LEGO parts by name to locate specific pieces for your projects.
Instructions
Search LEGO parts by name.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| search | Yes | ||
| api_key | No |
Find LEGO parts by name to locate specific pieces for your projects.
Search LEGO parts by name.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| search | Yes | ||
| api_key | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description only states the basic action. Does not disclose return format, pagination, error behavior, or authentication implications (api_key).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise, one sentence, but front-loads the action. However, it sacrifices completeness for brevity, lacking necessary details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is insufficient. An agent cannot infer return structure, pagination, or expected input constraints.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, meaning no parameter descriptions. The description does not explain the 'search' parameter format or the 'api_key' purpose, leaving the agent without guidance.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool searches LEGO parts by name, which is a specific verb+resource combination. It distinguishes from siblings like lego_search_sets (sets) and lego_set_parts (parts of a set), though it lacks further context.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like lego_set_parts or lego_search_sets. No mention of prerequisites or scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/malamutemayhem/unclick'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server