twitch_search_games
Search for Twitch games by querying game name with client ID and secret.
Instructions
Search for games on Twitch.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| client_id | No | ||
| client_secret | No |
Search for Twitch games by querying game name with client ID and secret.
Search for games on Twitch.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| client_id | No | ||
| client_secret | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as read-only nature, authentication requirements, rate limits, or pagination. The description carries the full burden but adds no behavioral context beyond the basic action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise at five words, but it is under-specified for a tool with three parameters. Being concise should not come at the expense of necessary detail; this is closer to inadequate than concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given three parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description should provide more context about what the search returns and how parameters affect results. It is far from complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any of the three parameters (name, client_id, client_secret). It fails to add meaning beyond the schema, such as noting that client_id and client_secret are optional or for authentication.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Search for games on Twitch.' clearly states the action (search) and resource (games on Twitch). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like twitch_top_games and twitch_search_streams, as it focuses specifically on game search.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like twitch_top_games. There is no mention of prerequisites such as authentication with client_id/client_secret, nor any exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/malamutemayhem/unclick'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server