twitch_search_games
Searches Twitch for games matching a given name, providing game IDs and details for stream analysis.
Instructions
Search for games on Twitch.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| client_id | No | ||
| client_secret | No |
Searches Twitch for games matching a given name, providing game IDs and details for stream analysis.
Search for games on Twitch.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| client_id | No | ||
| client_secret | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It only states 'search' but does not disclose authentication needs, rate limits, or search behavior (e.g., exact match vs fuzzy).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence, but it lacks essential details. It is neither overly verbose nor well-structured; front-loading key information would improve it.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 3 parameters (1 required) and no output schema, the description is too minimal. It omits authentication context, search mechanics, and result format, making it incomplete for effective tool use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% (no parameter descriptions in schema). The description adds no information about parameters like 'name' (game name?) or authentication credentials (client_id, client_secret).
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool searches for games on Twitch. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like twitch_search_streams or twitch_top_games, which have similar purposes.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., twitch_top_games for top games, twitch_get_stream for streams). No context or exclusions provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/malamutemayhem/unclick'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server