bandsintown_events
Get upcoming events for an artist from Bandsintown.
Instructions
Get upcoming events for an artist on Bandsintown.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| artist | Yes | ||
| date | No | ||
| app_id | No |
Get upcoming events for an artist from Bandsintown.
Get upcoming events for an artist on Bandsintown.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| artist | Yes | ||
| date | No | ||
| app_id | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits. However, it only says 'get upcoming events' and does not mention authentication, rate limits, error handling, or what happens if the artist is not found.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short (one sentence), which is concise but at the expense of completeness. It is front-loaded but does not earn its place by providing sufficient information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description is too minimal. It does not explain what data is returned (list of events, details, etc.) or any other necessary context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the 'date' or 'app_id' parameters. It only mentions 'artist' implicitly. The description fails to add meaning beyond the raw schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it gets upcoming events for an artist, which is a specific verb+resource combination. It distinguishes from sibling tools like bandsintown_artist and bandsintown_recommended.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance is provided. The context of when to use this versus the sibling tools is implied but not stated, leaving the agent to infer from the description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/malamutemayhem/unclick'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server