Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to UnClick MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An open-source MCP server for macOS and Windows that provides native desktop control via Accessibility APIs, OCR, and Chrome CDP. It enables AI agents to interact with applications, manage browser sessions, and automate workflows with high-speed native UI actions.
      89 npm
      15
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI tools to control local browser sessions for ChatGPT, Claude, and other AI services, supporting querying, navigation, file uploads, and artifact management.
      35 npm
      564
      Mozilla Public 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI coding assistants direct access to the browser — navigate, click, fill forms, run JavaScript, take screenshots, and read page content.
      11
      10 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for macOS that enables AI agents to control the desktop GUI through keyboard input, mouse actions, and screen captures. It provides stable low-level primitives for UI automation and agent-driven desktop workflows.
      MIT

    TDQS

    D1.8/5.0

    Scored across 813 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    The server aggregates an enormous and unrelated collection of tools from dozens of distinct domains, many with overlapping purposes (e.g., crypto_price vs cmc_quotes vs stock_quote, weather_forecast vs tomorrow_forecast vs willyweather_forecast, multiple search/search variants). Multiple generic 'action' tools (notion_action, github_action, etc.) abstract many sub-actions, creating ambiguity about which tool to call. Almost no tool has a unique, non-overlapping role across the set.

    Naming Consistency1/5

    Naming uses no consistent pattern: some tools use verb_noun (sendle_get_quote, list_calendly_event_types), some use noun_verb (mc_quotes, weather_forecast), many use bare domain prefixes (amber_sites, esports_matches), and several are generic 'action' tools (slack_action, github_action). Conventions are wildly mixed with no discernible consistent style.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 813 tools, this is a massive aggregate of almost every possible MCP integration, far beyond any single-purpose server. The count is extreme and unwieldy, making it nearly impossible for an agent to efficiently select the right tool. Many tools cover overlapping functionality across different providers.

    Completeness1/5

    The server attempts to cover an impossibly broad domain (global APIs, productivity, finance, gaming, media, etc.), but individual areas are often incomplete: many CRUD operations are missing (e.g., no update for many resources), several providers only expose partial endpoints, and no coherent lifecycle is covered for any single domain. The enormous breadth makes meaningful completeness assessment impossible, but obvious gaps exist (e.g., serious lack of write operations in many integrations).

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessSyncing