tm_get_venue
Retrieve details for a specific Ticketmaster venue using its ID. Obtain name, location, and other venue data.
Instructions
Get details for a specific Ticketmaster venue.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| api_key | No |
Retrieve details for a specific Ticketmaster venue using its ID. Obtain name, location, and other venue data.
Get details for a specific Ticketmaster venue.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| api_key | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits beyond the basic operation. It does not explicitly state that the tool is read-only, nor does it mention potential failure conditions or authentication needs.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with no extraneous information. However, it could be slightly more informative without sacrificing brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and low parameter coverage, the description is insufficiently complete. It does not describe the response format or indicate that the tool returns venue details; it only states the action without context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description does not explain either parameter (id, api_key). With 0% schema description coverage, the description should add meaning to the parameters, but it offers nothing beyond the schema names.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get details for a specific Ticketmaster venue' clearly states the verb (Get) and resource (details for a specific venue). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like tm_search_venues (search) and other venue tools from different APIs.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as tm_search_venues to find a venue ID first. No prerequisites or context for invoking the tool are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/malamutemayhem/unclick'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server