sleeper_players

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations, and description fails to disclose behavioral traits such as pagination, rate limits, or how the sport parameter affects results. The claim 'all NFL players' is vague.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise single sentence with no fluff. However, it sacrifices informativeness for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and a simple parameter, the description is too sparse. It does not explain return structure, pagination, or the effect of the sport parameter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

0% schema description coverage. The description does not explain the 'sport' parameter; it only mentions NFL, but the parameter might allow other sports. No added meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves all NFL players from Sleeper, with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like sleeper_nfl_state and sleeper_trending_players.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like sleeper_league or sleeper_trending_players. No exclusions or context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.