algolia_get_object

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description indicates a read-only operation ('Retrieve'), which is transparent. However, with no annotations provided, it does not disclose other behavioral traits such as rate limits, authentication requirements beyond schema, or any side effects. The schema already covers credential parameters.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence (12 words) that front-loads the purpose and method. No unnecessary words or repetitions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read operation with all parameters required and no output schema, the description is nearly complete. It covers the what and how. A minor improvement would be mentioning the return format (object), but this is not essential.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with all four parameters described. The description does not add meaning beyond the schema; it only reiterates the 'objectID' parameter. Baseline of 3 is appropriate as the schema carries the full burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Retrieve' and the resource 'a single record from an Algolia index', and specifies the method 'by its objectID'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like algolia_search (multiple results) and algolia_browse_index (browse all records).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when a specific objectID is known, but does not explicitly state when to use or avoid this tool, nor does it mention alternative tools like algolia_search for non-objectID lookups or algolia_browse_index for multiple records.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.