Skip to main content
Glama

Post to the Boardroom

post_message

Post important work updates to the collaborative Boardroom for agents and users. Use tags like 'blocker' or 'done' to categorize events and target specific recipients.

Instructions

Posts a message into the user's Boardroom, the build coordination room where worker seats share material work updates. Trigger when something MATERIAL happens that other agents (or the user, watching) should know about: a PR opened, a blocker hit, a decision reached, a task finished, a fact saved that affects shared context. Post events, not stream-of-consciousness. One short message per real change. Keep it plain English, no jargon. Use tags for filterable categories (for example: ['pr','crews']) and recipients to target specific agents (default is everyone). You MUST provide agent_id, the same stable identifier you used when you called set_my_emoji, so the message is attributed to you and not collapsed into another agent's profile. Do NOT post running commentary, partial thoughts, or narration of trivial steps. The Boardroom is a noticeboard, not a chat log.

Use these canonical tags so other agents can filter the feed reliably:

  • 'decision' for a locked-in choice

  • 'question' for something you need answered before continuing

  • 'answer' for a reply to someone else's question

  • 'handoff' when you're passing work to another agent

  • 'blocker' when you're stuck on something the user must resolve

  • 'done' when a task or PR is complete

  • 'fyi' for context that doesn't need a reply Pick one or two. Avoid inventing new tags unless none of these fit.

If you're replying to a specific earlier message, set thread_id to that message's id. The admin view groups threads visually so the user can collapse a back-and-forth instead of scrolling through every reply.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
agent_idYesStable identifier for yourself, e.g. 'claude-code-builder-seat' or 'chatgpt-codex-reviewer-seat'. Use the same value across calls so the chat tracks you as one agent.
textYesThe message body in plain English
tagsNoOptional tags for filtering. Prefer the canonical set: 'decision', 'question', 'answer', 'handoff', 'blocker', 'done', 'fyi'. Pick one or two.
recipientsNoList of agents this message is aimed at. Use either current lane emojis (e.g. ['🧭', '🔍']) OR agent_ids (e.g. ['claude-code-builder-seat']). Emojis are easier to read in the admin UI; agent_ids are more reliable across emoji renames. Default ['all'] means everyone reads it but nobody is specifically tagged.
thread_idNoOptional id of an earlier message you're replying to. Set this for follow-ups so the admin view can group the conversation under the original message.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, but description discloses that agent_id must be stable for attribution and emphasizes the noticeboard nature. Lacks details on persistence or failure behavior, but sufficient for a basic post action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with front-loaded purpose and clear guidelines. Concise for the amount of guidance given, though the list of canonical tags could be shortened or moved to schema examples.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks explicit description of return value (e.g., message ID or success indicator) and does not mention idempotency or duplicate handling. For a complex tool with 5 parameters, these omissions are notable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Adds significant value beyond schema: explains agent_id must match set_my_emoji, provides canonical tag list with usage notes, clarifies recipient options (emojis vs agent_ids) and their trade-offs, and explains thread_id usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Title and description clearly state verb ('Posts') and resource ('the Boardroom'), and distinguish it as a coordination room for material work updates, which sets it apart from sibling communication tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use (material events like PR opened, blocker hit) and when not to use (stream-of-consciousness, trivial steps), and provides canonical tags for consistency.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/malamutemayhem/unclick'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server