algolia_browse_index

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description reveals pagination mechanism (cursor-based) but lacks broader behavioral traits such as rate limits, authentication requirements, or error handling. Since no annotations exist, the description carries the burden but provides minimal additional context beyond the pagination detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that is front-loaded with the core action. No extraneous information; every word serves a purpose. The structure clearly communicates the tool's function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description provides an adequate but incomplete picture. It explains the pagination approach but omits response format, potential errors, and other practical details needed for reliable use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for all 7 parameters. The description adds no extra semantic meaning for parameters beyond noting cursor-based pagination, which is mentioned elsewhere. At baseline 3 due to high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states the verb 'Browse' with a clear resource 'all records in an Algolia index' and adds 'paginated cursor-based' detail. It distinguishes from sibling tools like algolia_get_object and algolia_search, which operate on single objects or searches respectively.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The context of paginated browsing is implied, but no mention of when-not-to-use or alternative tools for different scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.